Advertise  Subscription



   Site Map
   Front Page
   Nation/Politics
   World
   Commentary
   Editorials/Op-Ed
   Metropolitan
   Sports
   Business
   Special Reports
   Technology
   Entertainment
   Books
   Food
   Wash. Weekend
   Travel
   Family Times
   Culture, etc.
   Civil War
   Weather
   Corrections
   Photo Gallery
   TWT Insider
Stock Quotes
Symbol Lookup
   Classifieds
   Home Guide
   Auto Weekend
   Employment
   Health
   Services Directory
   Market Place
   Tourist Guide
   Holiday Gift Guide
   International Reports
   Archive
   Subscription Services
   Advertise
   About TWT
   Contact Us
   TWT Gift Shop
   Insight Magazine
   The World & I
   National Weekly
   Middle East Times
   Tiempos del Mundo
   Segye Ilbo
   Segye Times USA
   Chongyohak Shinmun
   Sekai Nippo
   Wash. Golf Monthly
   World Peace Herald

 

Caregiving

The ABCs of Living Wills and Health Care Proxies


Author:

Aytan Bellin, JD

New York State Task Force

Medically Reviewed On: March 31, 2006

Introduction

Ordinarily, when you go to a physician for medical care, you and your physician discuss your treatment options and you decide which treatments, if any, you wish to undergo. The law recognizes that if you are an adult of sound mind, neither your physicians nor anyone else may treat you without your consent. This is true even if the treatments are necessary to keep you alive.

There are occasions where some people, because of their personal, religious or other beliefs, the nature of their illnesses, or the nature of proposed life-sustaining treatments, would choose to forgo such treatments. For example, many people feel that if they were to fall into an irreversible coma with no hope of recovery, they would rather be permitted to die than be hooked up to respirators and other machines indefinitely.

Unfortunately, when decisions about life-sustaining treatment have to be made, people are often in no condition to express their treatment wishes. Without evidence of such wishes, some state laws make it very difficult to stop life-sustaining treatments even if family members or close friends believe that the patient would have wanted such treatments stopped.

A good example of this is a case involving twenty-five year old Nancy Cruzan. In 1983, Nancy was severely injured in an automobile accident and lost her mental faculties. To keep her alive, the hospital hooked her up to equipment that provided her artificial nutrition and hydration. After learning that Nancy had almost no chance of regaining consciousness and recovering her mental abilities, Nancy's parents asked a court to permit them to disconnect the nutrition and hydration equipment. The court refused to do so, even though there was evidence from one of Nancy's friends that Nancy would not have wanted to be kept alive under these circumstances. The court found this evidence insufficient as the state law required clear and convincing evidence of Nancy's wishes.

Fortunately, all states have created mechanisms, known as advance directives, through which you can help to assure that your treatment preferences will be known and acted upon even if you are incapacitated when medical decisions have to be made. Two such mechanisms are living wills and health care proxies.

Living Wills

Page 1 of 5 Next Page >>

Advertising
 
   

All site contents copyright © News World Communications, Inc.
Privacy Policy
 
Health
Nation/Politics World Commentary Classifieds